Sentriva Publishers follows a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure the quality, originality, and scientific integrity of every published article. Each manuscript undergoes editorial screening, expert peer review, revision where necessary, and final editorial approval before publication.
Our editorial workflow is designed to provide a fair, transparent, and timely peer review process for every manuscript.
Once an author submits a manuscript, our managing staff runs a series of initial editorial checks. This step includes checking plagiarism screening using advanced anti-plagiarism scanning tools, validating format requirements, checking ethical clearances, and verifying journal scope. Submissions with high duplication rates or submission deficiencies are returned instantly for revisions.
Manuscripts that clear the initial filter are routed directly to the chief editor or an appropriate section editor. The handling editor looks closely at the scientific quality, originality, and relevance and scientific weight to decide if it is strong enough for external peer review. Papers that lack sufficient novelty are desk-rejected at this stage.
The manuscript is sent to at least two external subject matter experts for blind independent peer review. Reviewers evaluate the soundness of the methodology, statistical analysis, research findings, and scientific conclusions. To prevent bias, authors do not know who reviewed their work, and reviewers do not see the authors' names or institutional details.
Once the external peer feedback reports are compiled, the handling editor makes an official decision: Accept As Is, Minor Revisions, Major Revisions, or Reject If changes are required, the author receives clear, constructive feedback and an explicit deadline to upload their revised manuscript.
Following formal acceptance, the manuscript enters our production process for professional professional typesetting, copyediting, reference verification, and high-resolution figure optimization. Authors review and approve a final galley proof, after which the article receives its permanent Crossref DOI and is published online on the live journal platform under an open-access license.
Are you a reviewer assigned to a peer review? Review our review responsibilities and evaluation criteria.
Reviewer Guidelines