Sentriva Publishers is committed to maintaining the highest standards of publication ethics, editorial integrity, and research transparency. Our editorial policies are guided by the principles and Core Practices of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
We maintain a zero-tolerance policy toward plagiarism, data fabrication, image manipulation, duplicate publication, and other forms of research misconduct.
All listed individuals must have made significant intellectual contributions to the study's conception, study design, data analysis, or manuscript drafting. Sentriva firmly prohibits ghost, gift, or guest authorship practices.
The corresponding author holds primary responsibility for confirming that all co-authors have verified, approved, and backed the final version before manuscript submission.
Sentriva runs plagiarism screening against every submitted manuscript using advanced anti-plagiarism scanning platforms. Any form of plagiarism, data falsification, figure manipulation, or research misconduct constitutes serious scientific malpractice.
If evidence of duplicate publication or text matches indicate cross-publishing issues during any stage of the editorial process, evaluation tracks stop instantly pending formal institutional investigation.
Authors must clearly declare financial agreements, institutional affiliations, funding sources, or employment conditions that could influence or bias the evaluation of their findings. Reviewers must also bow out of peer review if they discover conflicts of interest or shared institutional backgrounds with the active authors.
When post-publication errors are identified, Sentriva publishes clear, formal amendments or corrections. If verified data manipulation, calculation flaws, or ethical violations invalidate research conclusions, the editorial board issue a transparent retraction notice following standardized guidelines flowcharts.
Learn more about our editorial screening, peer review process, and publication workflow.
Peer Review Workflow